![]() ![]() ![]() Is it really the designers and developers who decide which software they use after all? Who’s driving the technology? Is it the creative innovators or is it the business men that they work for? Thus alienating a significant percentage of the design community. Oh and the best bit is that Microsoft have no plans whatsoever to produce the Expression suite for Macs. It certainly doesn’t seem like it’d be very easy to do stop-frame animation, and it doesn’t seem to have anything like onion-skinning, so critical to our animators.īut even if it does, creative types are generally more afraid of new software than programmers are, it’ll definitely be difficult to persuade them to move away from their beloved Adobe software. Which is completely intuitive to a programmer, but not necessarily a designer.Īnd does Blend have the same animation features as Flash? It looks like all of its animation is produced using keyframes and tweens. This means that items at the bottom of the tree appear on top of everything else. For example the hierarchy of objects is much more explicit, with a tree structure on the left. Will the Expression suite appeal to these people? Looking at how Blend is arranged, it certainly seems to be a lot more technical than Flash. And there are some truly awesome creatives whose skills are well and truly embedded in Flash or Photoshop. They have a long history with Adobe products and have invested many years into learning these tools. net programmers over.īut what about the creative types Graphic designers, animators and illustrators. Adobe’s recent excellent efforts with AS3 and Flex are probably too late to win the. And add to that years of fairly weird programming environments and they’ve just gone screaming for the hills. They seem to hate Flash, the early skip intro atrocities have scared them off forever. net developers are completely and utterly won over. So what’s going to happen? Have I been drinking too much of the green tinted Koolaid? Read on my friend, and all will be revealed. Eeek loads of scary net developers! Booo.As a result, developers can write client-side code for Silverlight in the same language they use for server-side code (such as C# and VB), and use many of the same abstractions (including streams, controls, collections, generics, and LINQ). Silverlight natively supports the C# language, and uses a range of. Silverlight provides a browser plug-in with many similar features to Flash, but one that’s designed from the ground up for. NET developers a better option for creating rich web content. NET code, which means it’s difficult to integrate ASP.NET content and Flash content. Apart from that, there is no way to generate Flash content using server-side. They need to learn a development environment like ActionScript and Flex. For ASP.NET developers, to extend their websites using Flash content is not so simple. Flash uses ActionScript as the programming language and Flex as the programming environment, and most developers are far from these technologies. But it does not have a huge community as expected it may be because of the limited development tools which are not known to most developers. Flash is not a new technology, and already has had a long life span as compared to Silverlight. Adobe Flash is the most popular competitor to Silverlight, supporting browser plug-ins and enabling the execution of rich content for the Web.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |